Skip to content
Ideas for a more human education
Faceless learner signing toward a screen that emits floating question marks paired with hand-gesture icons.
Illustration: Human Learning Review, made with AI. It does not depict real people or events.
Research · Access & Inclusion

Exploring the design of LLM-powered question generation for deaf and hard of hearing learners

Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Summarized by Human Learning Review.

Summary

The study asks whether large language models can generate personalized quiz questions that help deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) students learn from video. To answer it, the researchers designed and refined a prototype over several rounds, then tested it in user studies with undergraduate DHH students. The prototype generated 2 kinds of questions. Visual Questions point to video segments where visual information could be misread, and Emotion Questions mark moments where earlier DHH learners showed, through emotional responses, that they were having trouble with the video.

  • LLM-generated questions showed significant potential for personalized learning among DHH students using video-based material.
  • Students' interaction with the AI system still ran into difficulties.
  • The authors trace those difficulties to an accessibility gap between text-based AI prompts and the sign languages that DHH students use as a first or native language.

The authors conclude that LLM-based educational technology has to be designed with language diversity and culture in mind. A tool built around written prompts can sit poorly with learners whose primary language is signed, and they argue that this mismatch needs attention if such tools are going to serve DHH students well.

Main findings

  • The authors found that LLM-generated quiz questions held significant potential for personalizing video-based learning for deaf and hard of hearing undergraduates.
  • Challenges remained in how DHH students interacted with the AI, according to the study's user testing.
  • The researchers attribute these challenges to a mismatch between text-based AI prompts and students' sign-based first or native languages.
  • The authors argue that designers of LLM-based educational tools should account for language diversity and culture.

This page is a short summary of a research paper. The full piece belongs to Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, and preprints may not have been peer reviewed.

Read the original at Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
A little room for reflection

A more considered
view of education.

Ideas worth sitting with. Practical questions worth asking. Human Learning Review, in your inbox.